Legal Opinion

Peiffer v. Hoyt

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 19, 2003No. 99C-18990; A115146PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*487KISTLER, J.

Petitioner appeals from a judgment dismissing her amended petition for post-conviction relief. She argues that the post-conviction court should have found that her trial attorney was constitutionally inadequate for failing to file a motion to suppress. We affirm.

While petitioner was staying at Gregory McLean’s home, police officers searched his home pursuant to a warrant. Among other things, the warrant authorized the officers to search for amphetamine, evidence of sales and distribution of amphetamine, documents that tended to show the source of the amphetamine, documents that…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. State v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Trujillo v. MaassOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Palmer v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Whinston v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Shoup v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2003

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Batzer Construction, Inc. v. John BoyerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  2. Peiffer v. HoytOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Corcoran v. Board of NursingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  4. Northwest Country Place, Inc. v. NCS Healthcare of Oregon, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  5. SAIF Corporation v. EllerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API