Legal Opinion

SAIF Corporation v. Eller

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 6, 2003No. H00-117; A116500PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.

In this medical fee dispute arising out of a workers’ compensation claim, petitioners SAIF Corporation and its insured, Miller Timber Services, Inc. (Miller), 1 seek judicial review of a final order of the Department of Consumer and Business Services (DCBS), Workers’ Compensation Division (WCD or the division). In that order, DCBS concluded that the services of a nonlicensed surgical assistant, Inez Eller, were reimbursable. SAIF makes both a procedural and a substantive challenge to the order, the first relating to the authority of a WCD employee to file exceptions to the hearing officer’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Don't Waste Oregon Committee v. Energy Facility Siting CouncilOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Davis v. O'BRIENOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Peiffer v. HoytCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  5. Aetna Cas. & Sur. v. SUE A. BLANTON, DCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. SAIF Corp. v. Donahue-BirranCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  2. Godinez v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  3. Cascade Physical Therapy v. Hartford Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  4. Broeke v. SAIFCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  5. Wiggins v. SAIFCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API