Legal Opinion

Batzer Construction, Inc. v. John Boyer

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 15, 2006No. 00-2145-L-1; A119350PublishedCited by 95 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Defendant appeals a judgment for plaintiffs in a contract action. He assigns error to the trial court’s grant of a directed verdict for plaintiffs on their claim and on his counterclaims. Plaintiffs cross-assign error to the trial court’s ruling that defendant’s counterclaims were not time barred by ORS 12.110(1), the general tort statute of limitation. We affirm.

Defendant and plaintiffs built buildings for lease to the United States Postal Service (USPS). Each party performed specific tasks to further that endeavor. Defendant found suitable land, purchased the land, and handled most of the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Yogman v. ParrottOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Deerfield Commodities, Ltd. v. Nerco, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  4. State v. WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Abercrombie v. Hayden Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1994

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by95 opinions

  1. Miller v. Columbia CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. Bloomfield v. WeaklandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. ZRZ Realty Co. v. Beneficial Fire & Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  4. Milne v. Milne Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  5. Staffordshire Investments, Inc. v. Cal-Western Reconveyance Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API