Anderson & Karrenberg v. Warnick
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McHUGH, Judge:
1 1 Jerry Warnick appeals the trial court's order denying his request for attorney fees incurred in defending against a legal action brought against him by the law firm Anderson & Karrenberg (A & K). In particular, Warnick contends that he was the prevailing party in the action, that the action was based upon a written contract containing a unilateral attorney fees provision, and that he is therefore entitled to his fees pursuant to Utah Code section 78B-5-826 (the Recip rocal Fee Statute). 1 § 78B-5-826 (LexisNexis 2008). See Utah Code Ann We affirm.
BACKGROUND
{2 Warnick…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Valcarce v. FitzgeraldUtah Supreme Court · 1998
- Prince v. Bear River Mutual Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
- R.T. Nielson Co. v. CookUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- Reighard v. YatesUtah Supreme Court · 2012
- United States Fidelity & Guarantee Co. v. United States Sports Specialty Ass'nUtah Supreme Court · 2012
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Express Recovery Services Inc. v. OlsonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017
- Federated Capital Corp. v. HanerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
- Hahnel v. Duchesne Land, LCCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
- Utah Telecommunication Open Infrastructure Agency v. HoganCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
- Young H2ORE v. J and M TransmissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2024
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.