Legal Opinion

Anderson & Karrenberg v. Warnick

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided October 4, 2012No. 20110553-CAPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McHUGH, Judge:

1 1 Jerry Warnick appeals the trial court's order denying his request for attorney fees incurred in defending against a legal action brought against him by the law firm Anderson & Karrenberg (A & K). In particular, Warnick contends that he was the prevailing party in the action, that the action was based upon a written contract containing a unilateral attorney fees provision, and that he is therefore entitled to his fees pursuant to Utah Code section 78B-5-826 (the Recip rocal Fee Statute). 1 § 78B-5-826 (LexisNexis 2008). See Utah Code Ann We affirm.

BACKGROUND

{2 Warnick…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Valcarce v. FitzgeraldUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Prince v. Bear River Mutual Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
  3. R.T. Nielson Co. v. CookUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Reighard v. YatesUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  5. United States Fidelity & Guarantee Co. v. United States Sports Specialty Ass'nUtah Supreme Court · 2012

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Express Recovery Services Inc. v. OlsonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017
  2. Federated Capital Corp. v. HanerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
  3. Hahnel v. Duchesne Land, LCCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
  4. Utah Telecommunication Open Infrastructure Agency v. HoganCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
  5. Young H2ORE v. J and M TransmissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2024

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API