Legal Opinion

Express Recovery Services Inc. v. Olson

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided April 27, 2017No. 20151013-CAPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

VOROS, Judge:

¶ 1 The principal question posed by this appeal concerns which party prevailed at trial and thus can claim the benefit of a contractual attorney fee provision. Express Recovery Services Inc., assignee of All Pro Appliance Service Inc., sued Daniel Paul Olson on a debt arising from an employment agreement between Olson and All Pro. Olson counterclaimed seeking a setoff (but no net damage award). Neither party proved its claims at trial. The trial court awarded no attorney fees, reasoning that neither party had prevailed. Olson contends on appeal that he prevailéd at trial…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Studley v. Boylston National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Valcarce v. FitzgeraldUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Dixie State Bank v. BrackenUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Spinks v. Chevron Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  5. Winegar v. Froerer Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1991

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Larson v. StaufferCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2022
  2. Gardiner v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
  3. Wihongi v. Catania SFHCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
  4. Thorp v. CharlwoodCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021
  5. Maxwell Masonry v. North RidgeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2022

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API