Legal Opinion

Utah Telecommunication Open Infrastructure Agency v. Hogan

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided January 10, 2013No. 20110629-CAPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McHUGH, Judge:

{1 Chris Hogan appeals from the trial court's denial of his motion for attorney fees and its refusal to hold Utah Telecommunication Open Infrastructure Agency (UTOPIA) in contempt. We affirm in part, and reverse and remand in part. °

BACKGROUND

¶ 2 UTOPIA and Hogan entered into a two-year Agreement for Professional Services (the Agreement) on May 12, 2009. 1 The Agreement outlined the scope of Hogan's duties and included a confidentiality provision, stating, "[Hogan] understands that the Services performed for UTOPIA are confidential and [Hogan] agrees to maintain such…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. International Union, United Mine Workers v. BagwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. 438 Main Street v. Easy Heat, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Valcarce v. FitzgeraldUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  4. J.M.W. v. T.I.Z.Utah Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Society of Professional Journalists v. BullockUtah Supreme Court · 1987

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bresee v. BartonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016
  2. Linebaugh v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
  3. Airstar v. Keystone AviationCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2022
  4. Greyhound Lines v. UTACourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
  5. Iota v. Davco Management CompanyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API