United States Fidelity & Guarantee Co. v. United States Sports Specialty Ass'n
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Justice NEHRING,
opinion of the Court:
INTRODUCTION
¶1 We have agreed to answer the following questions certified to us by the United States District Court for the District of Utah: (1) Does an insurer have a right to reimbursement or restitution against an insured? (2) If an insurer does have a right to reimbursement or restitution against an insured, are there any prerequisites to receiving such a right? (8) And finally, if such a right exists, does an insurer's payment in exeess of a policy's limit impact any such right? Because we conclude that an insurer may obtain the right to…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Beck v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- Texas Ass'n of Counties County Government Risk Management Pool v. Matagorda CountyTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- American Towers Owners Ass'n v. CCI Mechanical, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1996
- Davencourt at Pilgrims Landing Homeowners Ass'n v. Davencourt at Pilgrims Landing, LCUtah Supreme Court · 2009
- Prince v. Bear River Mutual Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. CotterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
- Reighard v. YatesUtah Supreme Court · 2012
- C.R. Eng. v. Swift Transp. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2019
- Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. HorneUtah Supreme Court · 2012
- Jones v. MacKey Price Thompson & OstlerUtah Supreme Court · 2015
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.