State v. L. P.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, J.
Appellant appeals a judgment committing her to the Department of Human Services, Mental Health Division, under ORS 426.130. Appellant contends that the court erred in finding that she was afflicted with a mental disorder at the time of the commitment hearing and that the disorder caused her to be a danger to herself. On de novo review, State v. R. H., 212 Or App 479, 481, 157 P3d 1286 (2007), we conclude that there was insufficient evidence that appellant posed a danger to herself and reverse.
ORS 426.130(1) authorizes an order of commitment if the court determines that a person is “[m]entally…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. AyalaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- State v. HambletonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- State v. JacobsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- State v. NorthCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. N. A. P.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- State v. K. K. G.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- State v. LPCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- State v. NAPCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007