Legal Opinion

State v. L. P.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 30, 2007No. MC050040; A129724PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, J.

Appellant appeals a judgment committing her to the Department of Human Services, Mental Health Division, under ORS 426.130. Appellant contends that the court erred in finding that she was afflicted with a mental disorder at the time of the commitment hearing and that the disorder caused her to be a danger to herself. On de novo review, State v. R. H., 212 Or App 479, 481, 157 P3d 1286 (2007), we conclude that there was insufficient evidence that appellant posed a danger to herself and reverse.

ORS 426.130(1) authorizes an order of commitment if the court determines that a person is “[m]entally…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. AyalaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  2. State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  3. State v. HambletonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  4. State v. JacobsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. State v. NorthCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. N. A. P.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  2. State v. K. K. G.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  3. State v. LPCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  4. State v. NAPCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API