Legal Opinion

State v. N. A. P.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 5, 2007No. 060161220; A131291PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, J.

Appellant appeals an order of involuntary civil commitment. In one of her assignments of error, appellant argues that there is insufficient evidence in the record to establish that she suffers from a mental disorder that renders her a danger to herself. ORS 426.005(l)(d)(A). On de novo review, State v. Hitt, 179 Or App 563, 565, 41 P3d 434 (2002), we conclude that the court erred in finding clear and convincing evidence that appellant’s mental disorder causes her to be a danger to herself. Because we reverse the trial court’s order on that claim of error, we need not address appellant’s other…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. AyalaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  2. State v. OlsenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  3. State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  4. State v. HambletonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  5. State v. HittCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. E.D.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. State v. M. J. F.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  3. State v. R. E.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  4. State v. NAPCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  5. State v. RECourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API