Legal Opinion

Camby v. Southern Railway Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 16, 1979No. 7828SC190PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN (Harry C.), Judge.

The rules of law governing motions for summary judgment are fully stated by Justice Moore in Kessing v. Mortgage Corp., 278 N.C. 523, 180 S.E. 2d 823 (1971). It would serve no useful purpose to restate them here.

The trial court found facts in its judgment. This practice is not contemplated in summary judgment proceedings. “ ‘The rule does not contemplate that the court will decide an issue of fact, but rather will determine whether a real issue of fact exists.’ ” Id. at 534, 180 S.E. 2d at 830. The question for the court is whether there is a genuine issue as to any…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kessing v. National Mortgage CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Page v. SloanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. Robinson v. McMahanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Edwards v. MeansCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Camby v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Martini v. Companion Property & Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  3. Martini v. Companion Property & Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API