Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Martini v. Companion Property & Casualty Insurance

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 7, 2009No. COA08-1127Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partSteelman, Judge

I must respectfully dissent from the majority decision in the appeal of defendant and concur in the result only in the appeal of plaintiff.

I. Summary Judgment

A. Standard of Review

Our appellate courts review a trial court’s ruling on a motion for summary judgment de novo. Forbis v. Neal, 361 N.C. 519, 524, 649 *48S.E.2d 382, 385 (2007). Summary judgment is appropriate where “the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that any party is entitled to a judgment as…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Forbis v. NealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007
  2. Capps v. City of RaleighCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  3. Ransom v. Fidelity and Casualty Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  4. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. Tew v. BrownCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API