Camby v. Southern Railway Co.

MARTIN (Harry C.), Judge.

Plaintiff presents two assignments of error for our consideration. First, plaintiff contends the trial court erred in striking certain testimony concerning a telephone call made by the witness Graham to defendant railway company. The pertinent testimony and the court’s ruling follows:

A. ... I called the Southern Railway and talked with them about it and he said that he appreciated me calling—

Mr. Bennett: Objection, move to strike as to — unless some identification as to who called and who was spoken with.

The Court: Sustained.

*671It was about a week before this wreck that…