Legal Opinion

Edwards v. Means

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 18, 1978No. 7721SC242PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Judge.

Summary judgment is an extreme remedy and should be awarded only where the truth is quite clear and undisputed. It is improper unless the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, admissions and affidavits show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Lee v. Shor, 10 N.C. App. 231, 178 S.E. 2d 101 (1970). In the case at bar, we conclude that the pleadings and other documents relied on by the judge are insufficient to carry defendant’s burden of showing the absence of a triable issue and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lee v. ShorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  2. Robinson v. McMahanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gladstein v. South Square AssociatesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Stansfield v. MahowskyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Camby v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Vassey v. BurchCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  5. Vassey v. BurchCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API