Legal Opinion
Butler v. Zeiss
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 19, 1923No. Civ. No. 4557PublishedCited by 5 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.
The plaintiff commenced an action to recover damages; she was awarded a judgment in the trial court, and the defendants have appealed. The facts are briefly stated in the findings as follows:
“1. That on the 23d day of April, 1913, plaintiff became, and ever since has been, and now is, the owner in fee of, and as such owner was during all of said time, and now is, in possession of, that certain real property, together with the appurtenances thereunto belonging, located in the town of Inverness, county of Marin, State of California, described as follows:
“Lot number fifteen (15) in block sixteen…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Davis v. HearstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Donahue v. . Keystone Gas Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Grandona v. LovdalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Scarborough v. WoodillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Stewart v. SeftonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by5 opinions
- Swall v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Crofoot Lumber, Inc. v. FordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Roche v. CasissaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Fick v. NilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Caldwell v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963