Scarborough v. Woodill
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Riverside County, and from an order denying a new trial. F. E. Densmore, Judge, The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtTaggart, J.
Appeal from judgment and order denying motion for a new trial.
Plaintiff and defendant own adjoining orange orchards in the county of Riverside, which are separated by a row of cypress trees growing on the boundary line between them. The trees vary in diameter from thirteen to twenty-three inches, and in height from seventy to seventy-five feet, and the trunks thereof stand partly on one side and partly on the other side of said line.
Defendant cut down eight of these trees (every alternate two), and threatened to continue to cut every alternate two trees until he had cut one-half of the entire…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Robinson v. ClappSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
- McCord v. Oakland Quicksilver Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1883
- Dubois v. . BeaverNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
- Harndon v. StultzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Musch v. BurkhartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Jay v. DollarhideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Garcia v. SanchezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1989
- Booska v. PatelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Rhodig v. KeckSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966
- Love v. BishopSupreme Court of Colorado · 2018
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.