Dorsen v. Kay
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtDupont, C. J.
The defendant appeals from the judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the plaintiffs, upon the findings of an attorney trial referee. The referee found that the defendant was individually liable under an enforceable purchase and sale agreement, in the amount of $23,800 plus costs, for the defendant’s refusal to purchase the plaintiffs’ real estate. The defendant raises six claims of error on appeal. Five of the claims of error challenge the factual findings and conclusions of the referee. We are unable to reach the merits of these claims because none of the five claims of error was…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Seal Audio, Inc. v. Bozak, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- LiVolsi v. PylypchukConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
3Cited by9 opinions
- Rostenberg-Doern Co. v. WeinerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Rowan Construction Corp. v. HassaneConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Iroquois Gas Transmission System v. MileskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Humiston v. Intervest Management Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- O'Connell, Flaherty & Attmore, LLC v. DoodyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.