Legal Opinion
Rowan Construction Corp. v. Hassane
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 21, 1988No. 6487PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBieluch, J.
This is an appeal by the plaintiff from the judgment rendered for the defendant on the plaintiff’s amended complaint and on the defendant’s revised counterclaim. The plaintiff claims that the trial court erred (1) in denying its motion for a mistrial, (2) in accepting the report of the attorney trial referee, and (3) in assessing the amount of damages sustained by the defendant. We find error.
*73On or about July 10, 1981, the parties entered into a written contract under which the plaintiff agreed to purchase property of the defendant on or before April 1, 1982, for the price of $370,000. A…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Seal Audio, Inc. v. Bozak, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- West Haven Sound Development Corp. v. City of West HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Bowman v. 1477 Central Avenue Apartments, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Beckman v. JALICH HOMES, INC.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- LaBow v. LaBowConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Rostenberg-Doern Co. v. WeinerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- State v. MartinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Boulevard Associates v. Sovereign Hotels, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1994
- State v. BunkerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Nielsen v. WisniewskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.