Legal Opinion
O'Connell, Flaherty & Attmore, LLC v. Doody
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 21, 2010No. AC 30977PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DUPONT, J.
The defendant, attorney James J. Doody III, appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered in accordance with findings of fact made by a fact finder, attorney Kerry R. Callahan, in favor of the plaintiff, O’Connell, Flaherty & Attmore, LLC, and seeks a new trial. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court (1) failed to render a timely decision in violation of General Statutes § 51-183b and (2) erred in numerous findings of fact. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The record reveals the following facts and procedural history relevant to our resolution of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Seal Audio, Inc. v. Bozak, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Tele Tech of Connecticut Corp. v. Department of Public Utility ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Dubaldo Electric, LLC v. Montagno Construction, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Dorsen v. KayConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- LiVolsi v. PylypchukConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. ShermanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Mattie & O'Brien Contracting Co. v. Rizzo Construction Pool Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2011