Legal Opinion

Iroquois Gas Transmission System v. Mileski

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 10, 1996No. 14448PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

The defendant, Henry Mileski, appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered in accordance with a condemnation committee’s report. Mileski claims that the court improperly rendered judgment because the committee (1) engaged in irregular or improper conduct in the performance of its duties, (2) failed to make an independent determination of value and fair compensation, (3) failed to use the “before and after” method of valuation in determining damages, (4) did not consider severance damage, and (5) did not consider the highest and best use of the property, and that the trial court…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Harbor Construction Corporation v. DV Frione & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
  2. Kowalsky Properties, Inc. v. Sherwin-Williams Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1986
  3. Garofalo v. ArgravesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
  4. Dorsen v. KayConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  5. Gasparri v. Department of TransportationConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bordiere v. Defranco, No. Cv 96 0153626 (Nov. 21, 1997)Connecticut Superior Court · 1997
  2. City Check Cashing, Inc. v. Westport Pool, No. Cv 96 0153143 (Jul. 28, 1997)Connecticut Superior Court · 1997
  3. Iroquois Gas Transmission System v. MileskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  4. Lipton v. Cleveland, No. Cv 940141797 (Sep. 23, 1996)Connecticut Superior Court · 1996
  5. Mazako v. Tamis, No. 557305 (Dec. 2, 1999)Connecticut Superior Court · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API