Legal Opinion

LiVolsi v. Pylypchuk

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided October 27, 1987No. 5278PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiffs1 brought this action to set aside the conveyance of real property by the decedent to the defendant. The case was referred to an attorney trial referee pursuant to General Statutes § 52-434 (a) (4). After trial, the attorney referee filed a report setting forth his findings and recommending that judgment should issue in favor of the plaintiffs. On appeal from the judgment rendered by the trial court accepting the report of the attorney trial referee, the defendant challenges two findings of the attorney trial referee.

Practice Book § 438 requires that a party challenging the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Seal Audio, Inc. v. Bozak, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  2. Ruhl v. Town of FairfieldConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
  3. Kowalsky Properties, Inc. v. Sherwin-Williams Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1986

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bernard v. GershmanConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
  2. Rostenberg-Doern Co. v. WeinerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
  3. Dorsen v. KayConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  4. Humiston v. Intervest Management Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1989
  5. O'Connell, Flaherty & Attmore, LLC v. DoodyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API