Legal Opinion
Stack v. Welder
California Supreme Court
Decided April 1, 1935No. L. A. 14378PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.
In this action in foreclosure, the defendants Kirouff defaulted and are now before us upon appeal from the judgment and from an order denying their motion to vacate and set it aside. As to defendants Welder, the cause was tried on its merits; plaintiff had judgment, from which said defendants appealed, and said judgment was, on April 2, 1934, affirmed by the District Court of Appeal. (Stack v. Welder, 137 Cal. App. 647 [31 Pac. (2d) 426].) The following statement of facts will make clear the position of these appellants (the Kirouffs).
The Welders and the Kirouffs owned interests in some 700…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cal. Farm & Fruit Co. v. Schiappa-PietraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Cole v. Roebling Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Lawson v. GuildCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- People v. BlissCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Schainman v. KierceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hunter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- MacMorris Sales Corp. v. KozakCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Flood v. SimpsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Leo v. DunlapCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Cohen v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.