Legal Opinion

Leo v. Dunlap

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 12, 1968No. Civ. 30418PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAiso, J.

pro tem. * —In this personal injury action, originally filed in the municipal court, plaintiffs Ross Leo and Mary Leo appeal from a judgment of the superior court entered upon jury verdicts finding against each of them and in favor of defendant Nina Dunlap, and from an order (of the municipal court) granting defendant’s motion to set aside the ‘ ‘ default judgment. ’ ’

In limine the attempted appeal " from the order of the court made on August 9, 1963, granting defendant’s motion to set aside the default judgment” must be dismissed. Although both the notice of motion and the order use the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Burtnett v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Singleton v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Cole v. Roebling Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Thompson v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Rolley, Inc. v. Merle Norman Cosmetics, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1954

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Little v. Stuyvesant Life Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
  2. Engebretson & Co. v. HarrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  3. Petty v. Manpower, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1979
  4. Brown v. Pacific Telephone & Telelegraph Co.California Court of Appeal · 1980
  5. Ford v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API