Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Donaldson v. Alfred

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1993No. Nos. 91-1760 and 91-2247PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.

Relator has requested, by entering an order on his docket, payment for legal representation in responding to certain document requests served upon the municipal court. The city refused to comply with the order. In the mandamus action before, us, we are asked to decide whether relator’s *329funding order is sufficiently akin to the court funding orders that this court has repeatedly and consistently enforced in mandamus. We hold that it is. Because we grant the writ, the appeal in case No. 91-2247 is moot, and we do not address the issue therein.

Mandamus lies when the relator demonstrates a clear…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Westchester Estates, Inc. v. BaconOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State ex rel. Cleveland Municipal Court v. Cleveland City CouncilOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  3. State ex rel. Johnston v. TaulbeeOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State ex rel. Foster v. WittenbergOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Zangerle v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1943

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Seikbert v. WilkinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State ex rel. Master v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State ex rel. Wilke v. Hamilton County Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State ex rel. Master v. ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State ex rel. Harris v. City of ToledoOhio Supreme Court · 1995

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API