Zangerle v. Court of Common Pleas
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.
It is contended by the respondents in support of the demurrer that the petition for a writ of prohibition cannot be entertained or considered by this court for the reason that other adequate remedies are available to the relator, particularly the remedy of injunction.
The relator in- this action challenges the jurisdiction of the Court of Common Pleas to make the finding and order in question in an ex parte proceeding or to proceed further with the execution of such order. The respondents ■ urge that an action in injunction to restrain the • sheriff from carrying such order into effect would…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dahnke v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
- In re Court Room & Offices of the Fifth Branch of the Circuit Court, Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
- State Ex Rel. Kitzmeyer v. DavisNevada Supreme Court · 1902
- Board of Commissioners v. StoutIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by37 opinions
- O'Coin's, Inc. v. Treasurer of the County of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
- State ex rel. Cleveland Municipal Court v. Cleveland City CouncilOhio Supreme Court · 1973
- State ex rel. Johnston v. TaulbeeOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- State ex rel. Butler v. DemisOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- State ex rel. Foster v. WittenbergOhio Supreme Court · 1968
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.