Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Cleveland Municipal Court v. Cleveland City Council

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1973No. 72-320PublishedCited by 95 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteen, J.

Fundamental to both the complaint and the counterclaim is the nature of the parties thereto. On its face, the complaint is brought by the Cleveland Municipal Court rather than by the individual judges thereof. A court, however, is not sui juris. “ ‘A court is defined to be a place in which justice is judicially administered. It is the exercise of judicial power, by the proper officer or officers, at a time and place appointed by law.’ ” Todd v. United States (1895), 158 U. S. 278, 284. Absent express statutory authority, a court can neither sue nor be sued in its own right.

However,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Todd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. State ex rel. Foster v. WittenbergOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Zangerle v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1943
  4. State ex rel. Wallace v. City of CelinaOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  5. State ex rel. Milligan v. FreemanOhio Supreme Court · 1972

3Cited by95 opinions

  1. Patterson v. V & M Auto BodyOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Malone v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Scott v. Bank One Trust Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State ex rel. Village of Botkins v. LawsOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Timothy Cooper v. James RappCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API