Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Wilke v. Hamilton County Board of Commissioners

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 2000No. 99-2325PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Per curiam

R.C. 2101.11(B)(2); Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court

R.C. 2101.11(B)(2) provides the following procedure for a probate judge’s request for an appropriation of funds from the board of county commissioners and requires a probate judge who disagrees with the amount appropriated by the board to file a mandamus action in the court of appeals to resolve the dispute:

“The probate judge annually shall submit a written request for an appropriation to the board of county commissioners that shall set forth estimated administrative expenses of the court, including the salaries of appointees as determined…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Corrigan v. SeminatoreOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State ex rel. Pirman v. MoneyOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State ex rel. National City Bank v. Board of Education of Cleveland City School DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State ex rel. Johnston v. TaulbeeOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State ex rel. First New Shiloh Baptist Church v. MeagherOhio Supreme Court · 1998

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. S.J. v. Hamilton County, Ohio Hillcrest Training School and William H. HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  2. State ex rel. Dillery v. IcsmanOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State ex rel. Ohio Democratic Party v. BlackwellOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State ex rel. Woods v. Oak Hill Community Medical Center, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State ex rel. Dunlap v. SarkoOhio Supreme Court · 2013

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API