Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Master v. Cleveland

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1996No. 1995-1108PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 75 Ohio St.3d 23.] THE STATE EX REL. MASTER ET AL. v. CITY OF CLEVELAND ET AL. [Cite as State ex rel. Master v. Cleveland,

1996-Ohio-228.] Mandamus to compel city prosecutor to investigate alleged misuse of a police computer by a police officer, to initiate an investigation into criminal allegations already being investigated by other law enforcement personnel, and to appoint a special prosecutor—Writ denied, when. (No. 95-1108—Submitted December 5, 1995—Decided March 4, 1996.) IN MANDAMUS. __________________ {¶ 1} In 1993, relator…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Steckman v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State ex rel. National Broadcasting Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State ex rel. Master v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State ex rel. Thomas v. Ohio State UniversityOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State ex rel. James v. Ohio State UniversityOhio Supreme Court · 1994

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. McKnightOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer, Div. of Gannett Satellite Info. Network, Inc. v. DupuisOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State ex rel. Toledo Blade Co. v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' CompensationOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State ex rel. Ohio Patrolmen's Benevolent Assn. v. MentorOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State ex rel. Becker v. FarisOhio Court of Appeals · 2021

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API