Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Democrat Printing and Lithograph

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided May 14, 1997No. CA 96-915PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Andree Layton Roaf, Judge.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Commission finding that the appellant, Tommy Johnson, failed to prove that he suffered a compensable injury from exposure to toxic chemicals during his employment with the appellee, Democrat Printing and Lithograph. Johnson alleges that the Commission applied the wrong standard of proof in determining that his claim was for an occupational disease, and, accordingly, requiring him to prove compensability by clear and convincing evidence. He also asserts that there was not substantial evidence to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. City of Fort Smith v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992
  2. Silvicraft, Inc. v. LambertCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1983
  3. Wade v. Mr. C. Cavenaugh'sSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  4. Bradley v. AlumaxCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1995
  5. Welch's Laundry and Cleaners v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Oak Grove Lumber Co. v. HighfillCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Air Compressor Equipment v. SwordCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
  3. Ford v. Chemipulp Process, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
  4. Patterson v. Arkansas Department of HealthCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
  5. Hope Livestock Auction Co. v. KnightonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API