Legal Opinion

Oak Grove Lumber Co. v. Highfill

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided May 6, 1998No. CA 97-1075PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

D. Franklin Arey, III, Judge.

The Workers’ Compensation Commission found that appellee Harry Highfill’s second foot injury was a compensable consequence of his initial work-related injury. Appellee sustained his second injury when he stepped on, or tripped over, a tree root while walking through a park; he was in the park attending a church activity. The appellant, Oak Grove Lumber Company, argues that the Commission’s decision is not supported by substantial evidence and is erroneous as a matter of law. We affirm.

On June 16, 1995, appellee dropped a sledgehammer on his right foot while…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bearden Lumber Co. v. BondCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1983
  2. Marrable v. Southern LP Gas, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1988
  3. Carter v. Flintrol, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1986
  4. Lunsford v. Rich Mountain Electric CoopCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992
  5. Couch v. First State BankCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Geo Specialty Chemical, Inc. v. ClinganCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
  2. LVL, Inc. v. RagsdaleCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2011
  3. Smith-Blair, Inc. v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002
  4. Roth v. La Societe Anonyme Turbomeca FranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. J.B. Hunt Transport Services Inc. v. HollingsworthCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2016

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API