Legal Opinion

Ford v. Chemipulp Process, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided October 28, 1998No. CA 98-47PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Margaret Meads, Judge.

Appellant, Robert Ford, appeals the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission, which reversed the administrative law judge’s award of benefits for an allegedly compensable work-related injury. The Commission found that the claimant failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the incident of which he complained caused internal or external physical harm to the body and failed to establish a compensable injury by medical evidence supported by objective findings. On appeal, appellant contends that there is no substantial evidence to support the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Linthicum v. Mar-Bax Shirt Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1987
  2. McMillan v. U.S. MotorsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997
  3. Johnson v. HuxCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1989
  4. Stephens Truck Lines v. MillicanCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997
  5. High Capacity Products v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Wallace v. West Fraser South, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  2. Crudup v. Regal Ware, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  3. Emerson Elec. v. GastonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
  4. Grothaus v. Vista Health, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2011
  5. Williams v. Baldor Elec. Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2014

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API