Legal Opinion

City of Fort Smith v. Brooks

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided December 9, 1992No. CA 92-239PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Elizabeth W. Danielson, Judge.

The City of Fort Smith . appeals from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission finding that appellee Robert Brooks was entitled to benefits for his psychological condition. Appellant contends on appeal that the Commission’s decision is not supported by substantial evidence and that in the alternative, if the claim is compensable, appellee is not entitled to benefits prior to September 20, 1990. We affirm.

Appellee was employed with the Fort Smith Police Department for sixteen years. During this time, he worked in patrol duty, criminal investigation, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Willmon v. Allen Canning Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992
  2. Barrett v. Arkansas Rehabilitation ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1983
  3. Lewis v. Camelot HotelCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1991
  4. Patrick v. Arkansas Oak Flooring Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Williams v. Prostaff TemporariesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  2. McMillan v. U.S. MotorsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997
  3. Ray v. University of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1999
  4. Stephens Truck Lines v. MillicanCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997
  5. Cooper v. Hiland DairyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API