Legal Opinion

Bradley v. Alumax

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided June 14, 1995No. CA 94-743PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John Mauzy Pittman, Judge.

Appellant Sara Bradley appeals the Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Commission’s decision awarding a 15 percent permanent impairment rating and 30 percent wage-loss disability. Appellant argues that the decision is not supported by substantial evidence in that she is totally and permanently disabled. We affirm.

On appeal in workers’ compensation cases, we view the evidence and all reasonable inferences deducible therefrom in the light most favorable to the Commission’s findings and will affirm if those findings are supported by substantial evidence. Wright v. ABC Air,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wright v. ABC Air, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1993
  2. Grimes v. North American FoundryCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1993
  3. Cagle Fabricating and Steel, Inc. v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1993

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Harvest Foods v. WashamCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996
  2. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. StottsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
  3. Death & Permanent Total Disability Trust Fund v. BrewerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002
  4. Smith v. County Market/Southeast FoodsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
  5. Crossett School District v. FultonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1999

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API