Legal Opinion

Bordenkircher v. Hayes

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 6, 1978No. 76-1334PublishedCited by 2,442 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stewart

The question in this case is whether the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment is violated when a state prosecutor carries out a threat made during plea negotiations to reindict the accused on more serious charges if he does not plead guilty to the offense with which he was originally charged.

I

The respondent, Paul Lewis Hayes, was indicted by a Fayette County, Ky., grand jury on a charge of uttering a forged instrument in the amount of $88.30, an offense then punishable by a term of 2 to 10 years in prison. Ky. Rev. Stat. §434.130 (1973) (repealed 1975). After arraignment, Hayes, his…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2,442 opinions

  1. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. McCleskey v. KempSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. United States v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Hartman v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

2,437 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API