Legal Opinion

People v. Reyes

California Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1998No. S058825PublishedCited by 206 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BROWN, J.

In People v. Burgener (1986) 41 Cal.3d 505 [224 Cal.Rptr. 112, 714 P.2d 1251] (hereafter Burgener), this court held a parolee subject to a search condition still retains a reasonable, though somewhat diminished, expectation of privacy under the Fourth Amendment. Thus, a warrantless search of his person or property must be justified by at least a reasonable suspicion “that the parolee has violated the law or another condition of his parole, or is planning to do so.” (41 Cal.3d at p. 533, fn. omitted.) Subsequently, in In re Tyrell J. (1994) 8 Cal.4th 68 [32 Cal.Rptr.2d 33, 876…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by206 opinions

  1. Samson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. People v. JenkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  3. People v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  4. People v. FarnamCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  5. United States of America, State of California, Intervenor v. Raphyal Crawford, AKA Aarmyl CrawfordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

201 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API