Legal Opinion

Karl F. Hehl Engineering Co. v. Hubbell

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 5, 1955No. 17557PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holland

Defendant in error will herein be referred to as plaintiff, and plaintiff in error as defendant.

" Plaintiff is the owner of la tract of land in Adams county, and defendant is the lessee of adjoining land. There was a living, flowing spring of water on plaintiffs land, some little distance from defendant’s property. For approximately thirty years, plaintiff’s family and predecessors had utilized the flow of water therefrom for fish hatchery purposes, and more recently, had converted the premises to hog raising, and the water was channelled to troughs to provide fresh, pure water for the hogs,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nevius v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
  2. Hunter v. MichaelisUtah Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Schluter v. Burlington Ditch, Reservoir & Land Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1947

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Town of Genoa v. WestfallSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
  2. Current Creek Irrigation Co. v. AndrewsUtah Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Current Creek Irrigation Co. v. AndrewsUtah Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API