Legal Opinion

Schluter v. Burlington Ditch, Reservoir & Land Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 3, 1947No. 15,692PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

This action was brought by plaintiffs Schluter to quiet title to seep water rising in the Burlington ditch, and to enjoin interference with the use thereof. Defendant company, the owner of the Burlington ditch, is a mutual irrigation company. The ditch extends northerly from its headgate on the South Platte river, from which it has a decreed water right. Near its north and lower end, the ditch runs for some distance near the westerly end of Barr Lake and a 'channel extends approximately at right angles from the ditch easterly 1870 feet to the lake. This channel, which is referred to in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dehaas v. BeneschSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947
  2. Nicoloff v. Bloom Land & Cattle Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1937
  3. Needle Rock Ditch Co. v. AnkenmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1941

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Suburban Water Users Ass'n v. Colorado River Water Conservation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  2. People v. McGrathColorado Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Karl F. Hehl Engineering Co. v. HubbellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955
  4. City & County of Denver ex rel. Board of Water Commissioners v. Vail Valley Consolidated Water DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API