Legal Opinion

Hunter v. Michaelis

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1948No. 6995PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDONOUGH, Chief Justice.

Defendant appeals from a judgment on a verdict in favor of plaintiff for damages for personal injuries arising out of an accident in Beverly Hills, California. While walking or running across Wilshire Boulevard, plaintiff was struck by defendant’s car. Plaintiff’s left large toe was fractured, and in consequence thereof she received surgical attention which included removal of the joint, which caused permanent impairment of the function of that toe.

There is no dispute as to the fact that the accident occurred on Wilshire Boulevard, but the location on that boulevard…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. White v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. Martin v. HarrisonOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Austin v. NewtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  4. Neilson v. HouleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Lang v. BarryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pete v. YoungbloodCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2006
  2. Webb v. WebbUtah Supreme Court · 1949
  3. James Manufacturing Co. v. WilsonUtah Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Karl F. Hehl Engineering Co. v. HubbellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955
  5. Pridgen v. LewallenIdaho Supreme Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API