Legal Opinion

Nevius v. Smith

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 27, 1928No. 11,752PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Chief Justice

Denison delivered the opinion of the court.

Smith, plaintiff below, secured an injunction against plaintiffs in error, defendants below, restraining them from interfering with his use of five second feet of water which he claimed to have appropriated. Their claim is that the appropriation is from mere seepage which arises on their land and therefore is not subject to appropriation by others. The plaintiff on the other, hand claims that the waters which he appropriated were of' a stream flowing through defendant’s lands, not mere seepage but what he denominates a “seepage…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Comstock v. RamsaySupreme Court of Colorado · 1913
  2. Town of Sterling v. Pawnee Ditch Extension Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  3. Trowell Land & Irrigation Co. v. Bijou Irrigation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1918
  4. Rio Grande Reservoir & Ditch Co. v. Wagon Wheel Gap Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1920
  5. Fort Morgan Reservoir & Irrigation Co. v. McCuneSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. Southwestern Colorado Water Conservation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  2. Safranek v. Town of LimonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1951
  3. Dehaas v. BeneschSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947
  4. Faden v. HubbellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1933
  5. Whitten v. CoitSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API