Current Creek Irrigation Co. v. Andrews
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WADE, Justice.
Three cases are consolidated involving claims to water rights in various wells and springs in an underground water basin near Mona, Juab County, Utah. It is unnecessary at this point to detail the claims and counterclaims, appeals and cross-appeals. The position of the parties on the issues involved will be apparent. We group them according to their interests, and refer to them as Andrews (Orville Andrews, et al.), Fowkes (Gerald Fowkes, et al.), Current Creek Co. (Current Creek Irrigation Co.), and the State Engineer.
The central problem is whether prior appropriators of water…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- City of Lodi v. East Bay Municipal Utility DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Crescent Mining Co. v. Silver King Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1898
- Horne v. Utah Oil Refining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1921
- Willow Creek Irrigation Co. v. MichaelsonUtah Supreme Court · 1900
- Sullivan v. Northern Spy Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1895
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bingham v. Roosevelt City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2010
- Wayman v. Murray City CorporationUtah Supreme Court · 1969
- Rocky Ford v. Kents LakeUtah Supreme Court · 2020
- Stubbs v. ErcanbrackUtah Supreme Court · 1962
- Fairfield Irrigation Company v. WhiteUtah Supreme Court · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.