Legal Opinion

Current Creek Irrigation Co. v. Andrews

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1959No. 8745Published

1Opinion of the Court

9 Utah 2d 324 (1959)

344 P.2d 528

CURRENT CREEK IRRIGATION CO., A CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT,

v.

ORVILLE ANDREWS, DEFENDANT, RESPONDENT AND CROSS-APPELLANT.

ORVILLE ANDREWS ET AL., PLAINTIFFS, RESPONDENTS AND CROSS-APPELLANTS,

v.

CURRENT CREEK IRRIGATION CO., A CORPORATION, ET AL., DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.

GERALD FOWKES ET AL., PLAINTIFFS, RESPONDENTS AND CROSS-APPELLANTS,

v.

CURRENT CREEK IRRIGATION CO., A CORPORATION, ET AL., DEFENDANTS AND APPELLANTS.

No. 8745.

Supreme Court of Utah.

October 1, 1959.

Clyde & Mecham, Salt Lake City, Robert B. Porter, Deputy Atty. Gen., for appellant.

Carvel…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. City of Lodi v. East Bay Municipal Utility DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Crescent Mining Co. v. Silver King Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Horne v. Utah Oil Refining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Willow Creek Irrigation Co. v. MichaelsonUtah Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Sullivan v. Northern Spy Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1895

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API