Legal Opinion
Lenzner v. City of Trenton
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 8, 1952PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
22 N.J. Super. 415 (1952)
91 A.2d 896
ISADORE LENZNER AND FREDA LENZNER, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
CITY OF TRENTON, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF TRENTON, N.J., AND ALBERT G. HOWELL, ACTING CITY CLERK OF SAID CITY OF TRENTON, N.J., DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided October 8, 1952.
Mr. David Frankel for the plaintiffs (Mr. John A. Hartpence of counsel).
Mr. Louis Josephson for the defendants.
WOODS, J.S.C.
On May 29, 1952 the Board of Commissioners of the City of Trenton, New Jersey, adopted an ordinance providing for the acquisition…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Armour Packing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- Rogers v. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1906
- De Lorenzo v. City of HackensackSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- State Highway Com. v. ElizabethNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1928
- Bergen County Sewer Authority v. Borough of Little FerrySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Stanpark Realty Corp. v. City of NorfolkSupreme Court of Virginia · 1958
- Schnakenberg v. Gibraltar Savings and Loan Ass'nNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
- County of Essex v. HindenlangNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
- Weinstein v. City of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
- Trenton v. LenznerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.