Legal Opinion
Trenton v. Lenzner
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided February 8, 1954PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
29 N.J. Super. 514 (1954)
103 A.2d 13
CITY OF TRENTON, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
ISADORE LENZNER AND FREDA LENZNER, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, AND FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF PRINCETON, EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF JOHN S. VAN NEST, MORTGAGEE, WILLIAM EARDLEY, SOL BRODER, ROY ADAMS, MICHAEL CUNNINGHAM AND FRED BARTEL, TENANTS, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued February 1, 1954.
Decided February 8, 1954.
Before Judges EASTWOOD, JAYNE and FRANCIS.
Mr. John A. Hartpence argued the cause for appellants (Mr. David Frankel, attorney).
Mr. Louis Josephson argued the cause for respondent.
T…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- City of Newark v. New Jersey Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- Hudson Transit Corp. v. AntonucciSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1948
- De Lorenzo v. City of HackensackSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Borough of Little Ferry v. Bergen County Sewer AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Lenzner v. City of TrentonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- NJ Highway Authority v. J. & F. HOLDING CO.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- County of Essex v. HindenlangNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
- Mistretta v. City of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
- Weinstein v. City of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
- City of Trenton v. LenznerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954