Legal Opinion
State Highway Com. v. Elizabeth
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided February 1, 1928PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The complainant seeks to enjoin the defendant from interfering with the building and construction of State Highway Route No. 25 of the state highway system through the city of Elizabeth, and from interfering with that commission's entry upon certain lands of the city which the commission desires to take for the purposes of said highway. The matter comes before me on the return of an order to show cause issued by the chancellor.
State Highway Route No. 25 extends from Jersey City to Camden by way of Elizabeth, but the State Highway act (P.L. 1927ch. 319 p. 712) does not specify the course of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hunter v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- City of Trenton v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- New Jersey Interstate Bridge & Tunnel Commission v. City of Jersey CityNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1922
- Curtis & Hill Gravel & Sand Co. v. State Highway CommissionNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1920
- Goodavage v. State Highway Com.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Town of Winchester v. CoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
- Howell v. Port of New York AuthorityDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1940
- Louisiana Power and Light Co. v. City of HoumaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
- Miller v. Port of New York AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1939
- Riley v. South Carolina State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.