Legal Opinion
Tsang v. Kan
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 27, 1947No. Civ. 13241PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.
This is an appeal by defendant and cross-complainant, John Kan, from a judgment and decree in an action for declaratory relief in which the trial court adjudicated that he is a limited partner in a certain restaurant business to the extent of 1,000/9,700 and has no right to be employed by the corporation originally operating said business; its successor, a partnership, or the plaintiff, Ernest Tsang, the gen eral partner and manager of the partnership. For convenience, the plaintiff and cross-defendant will be referred to as Tsang, and the defendant and cross-complainant as Kan.
On September…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- The Edward Barron Estate Co. v. the Woodruff Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
- Munson v. FishburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Wilson v. Rigali & VeselichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Gerini v. Pacific Employers InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Harlow v. American Equitable Assurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
3Cited by9 opinions
- Abbot v. StevensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Hill v. WratherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Baker v. LittmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Gillespie v. OrmsbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Kan v. TsangCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.