Legal Opinion
Kan v. Tsang
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 11, 1949No. Civ. 13805PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDooling, J.
This is an appeal from an order allowing respondent Butterworth $4,000 for services as receiver and respondent Mahaney $6,000 for services as the receiver’s attorney.
The action was one for the dissolution of a partnership and for an accounting. The partnership was formed for the operation of a restaurant in San Francisco known as the Cathay House. The partnership was a limited one, the appellant Tsang being the only general partner and as such having full management of the business. Serious friction developed between Tsang and some of the other partners, in particular the plaintiff John Kan,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- San Francisco Breweries v. SchurtzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Loftus v. FischerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Chase v. Sunset Mutual Life Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1929
- Tsang v. KanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Houghton v. LawtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Eatwell v. BeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- People v. Riverside UniversityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Perrine v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1960
- De Angeles v. Roos Bros., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1966
- Westerholm v. 20th Century InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.