Legal Opinion
Alderson v. Insurance Co. of North America
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 4, 1990No. B043798PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DANIELSON, Acting P.J.
Carl Alderson (Carl) and Seiko Alderson (Seiko; collectively, Aldersons), husband and wife, appeal from a judgment in favor of Insurance Company of North America (INA) and from an order denying their motion for a new trial or to vacate the judgment and enter a different judgment.
We reverse the judgment and order.
Procedural and Factual Statement
On or about October 5, 1983, Wilma Buttz Watson (Wilma) and Kelly Watson (Watson) rented an automobile from Spectrum Investment Corporation, dba Budget Rent A Car and Budget Rent A Car of San Fernando Valley (Budget). On or…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Estate of McDillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Murphy v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Barrera v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Lemoge Electric v. County of San MateoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Metz v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hess v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 2002
- Thompson v. GoetzmannCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Fanning v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
- Fort Bragg Unified School District v. Colonial American Casualty & Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- In Re Dow Corning Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.