Legal Opinion

Barrera v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

California Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1969No. S.F. 22313PublishedCited by 148 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTobriner, J.

Plaintiff sued State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance' Company (hereinafter “State Farm”) to compel payment of a judgment obtained against Anthony and Sandra Alves. Plaintiff obtained the judgment against the Alveses on the ground that plaintiff, while a pedestrian, was injured by.Mrs. Alves’s negligent driving. Plaintiff alleged and urged thé enforceability at the time of the accident of an automobile liability policy issued by State Farm to the Alveses. State Farm denied the validity of the policy, and filed , a cross-complaint seeking a declaration that the policy was void ah .initio…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Glanzer v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  3. Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Lucas v. HammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by148 opinions

  1. Rawlings v. ApodacaArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Fletcher v. Western National Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Brown v. MerloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Murphy v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

143 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API