Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Allstate Insurance

California Supreme Court

Decided September 7, 1976No. L.A. 30571PublishedCited by 192 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CLARK, J.

Having received only partial satisfaction of her judgment against the insured tortfeasor, plaintiff seeks the balance from the insurer for refusing settlement within policy limits. However, there being no allegation the insured assigned his cause of action for breach of the covenant to settle, the trial court granted judgment on the pleadings in favor of the insurer, and plaintiff appeals. We affirm the judgment.

The complaint alleges plaintiff sued Pollard—insured by Allstate Insurance Company—for wrongful death of her nine-year-old son. Allstate rejected settlement demands of…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Crisci v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Lucas v. HammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  5. City of San Jose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by192 opinions

  1. Egan v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Moradi-Shalal v. Fireman's Fund Ins. CompaniesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Royal Globe Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. CNA Casualty of California v. Seaboard Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1986

187 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API