Legal Opinion
Thompson v. Goetzmann
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided December 17, 2002No. 02-10198PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
Before JOLLY, DUHÉ, and WIENER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
On petition for rehearing, we amend our opinion by deleting Part B.4, titled “Zim-mer Cannot Pay for Medical Services ‘Promptly,’ and Thereby Fails the MSP Statute’s Requirement for a ‘Self-Insurance Plan,”’ in its entirety, and deleting, in Part B.2, the italicized portion of the following sentence: “Although we agree with the district court’s determination that Zimmer is not liable under the MSP statute because it could not be reasonably expected to pay ‘promptly’ for Loftin’s medical care, we also…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Martin v. Alamo Community College DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- Julie Olden, Richard Hunter, Wilbur Bleau, and All Others Similarly Situated v. Lafarge Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Texas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Baxter International, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Cooper Tire & Rubber Co. v. FareseCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.