Yeager v. Blue Cross of California
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RUBIN, Acting P. J.
Deborah Dunn Yeager appeals, for herself and as class representative for all others similarly situated, from the trial court’s summary judgment dismissing her complaint against respondent Blue Cross of California. Her complaint alleges Blue Cross violated its statutory duty under Health and Safety Code section 1374.55 to offer coverage for treatment of infertility in the group health plan that Blue Cross provided to Dunn Yeager’s employer. We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
Appellant Deborah Dunn Yeager is employed by Westmont College. Dunn Yeager belongs to the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re Tobacco II CasesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & OpportunityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Amaral v. Cintas Corp. No. 2California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Industrial Welfare Commission v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Peralta Community College District v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Filmon.Com. Inc. v. Doubleverify Inc.California Supreme Court · 2019
- Arce v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- Jackpot Harvesting Co. v. Superior Court of Monterey Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Martha Garcia v. Pacificare of California, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Cardenas v. M. Fanaian, D.D.S., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2015
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.